Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Gaming
  • General
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Top Stories
  • More
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Cookies Policy
    • DMCA
    • GDPR
    • Terms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ZamPoint
  • Home
  • Business
  • Gaming
  • General
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Top Stories
  • More
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Cookies Policy
    • DMCA
    • GDPR
    • Terms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ZamPoint
Top Stories

Private: ‘Big Win for Us’: Court Rejects UP Govt’s Application in Dadri Lynching Case

ZamPointBy ZamPointDecember 23, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
story-hero-img
'Big Win for Us': Court Rejects UP Govt's Application in Dadri Lynching Case

(Exposing hate and communalism is a key focus area in The Quint’s reportage. Become a member and help us do more such stories).

A Surajpur court on Tuesday, 23 December has rejected the Uttar Pradesh government’s application to drop all the charges against the accused in the 2015 lynching of Mohammad Akhlaq.

“The application was on ‘baseless’ and ‘unfounded’ claims, the court observed,” Advocate Yusuf Saifi told The Quint.

Surajpur Court has observed that the application by the UP government was not on sufficient grounds, one main eyewitness (Shaista, Akhlaq’s sister) has also testified and the case at the evidence stage of the trial. Hence, the court cannot accept an application to drop the charges against the accused.

Advocate Yusuf Saifi to The Quint

In October this year, the UP government had submitted an application, invoking Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) to demand dropping the charges against the accused in Dadri lynching case, a decade after the heinous crime took place.

In its application the government had used arguments such as: “inconsistent statements by family,” no possession of firearm/sharp weapon” and “to restore social harmony.”

On Tuesday, Additional District Judge Saurabh Dwivedi rejected their application and also directed that the case be heard on a regular basis and to speed up the process of recording all the evidence in this case.

“It is a big deal that in a case pertaining to mob lynching, an application like this was rejected at this stage. Such an order, a rejection by the Court is a huge deal and a big win for us,” Advocate Yusuf Saifi told The Quint.

On the night of 28 September 2015, fifty-two-year-old Akhlaq and his son Danish were dragged out of their home in Bisada, Dadri. A mob attacked them following an announcement at a temple that the family had consumed beef. Danish survived, but Akhlaq did not.

The case is currently at the evidence stage and the next hearing in the case is on 6 January 2026.

Published: 23 Dec 2025, 3:52 PM IST

ZamPoint
  • Website

Related Posts

After 2024 Wayanad landslides, Kerala is building townships but not everyone will benefit

February 2, 2026

KTR targets Congress and BJP over financial discrimination, political diversion

February 2, 2026

Brain-Computer Interfaces 2026: Medical Breakthrough Ahead

February 2, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest RSS
  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Cookies Policy
  • DMCA
  • GDPR
  • Terms
© 2026 ZamPoint. Designed by Zam Publisher.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by