Close Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Gaming
  • General
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Top Stories
  • More
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Cookies Policy
    • DMCA
    • GDPR
    • Terms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ZamPoint
  • Home
  • Business
  • Gaming
  • General
  • News
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Tech
  • Top Stories
  • More
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    • Cookies Policy
    • DMCA
    • GDPR
    • Terms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ZamPoint
Business

House committee votes to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress

ZamPointBy ZamPointJanuary 22, 2026Updated:January 22, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
House committee votes to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress
House committee votes to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress

A House committee superior resolutions Wednesday to hold former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress over the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, opening the prospect of the House utilizing one of its strongest punishments towards a former president for the primary time.

In bipartisan votes, the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee authorised the contempt of Congress expenses, organising potential votes in the House early subsequent month. In a uncommon departure from get together traces, some Democrats supported the contempt measures towards the Clintons, with a number of progressive lawmakers emphasizing the necessity for full transparency in the Epstein investigation.

The votes have been the most recent flip in the Epstein saga as Congress investigates how the late financier was in a position to sexually abuse dozens of teenage women for years.

“No witness, not a former president or a private citizen, may willfully defy a congressional subpoena without consequence. But that is what the Clintons did and that is why we are here,” Rep. James Comer, the chairman, mentioned on the session on Wednesday.

The repercussions of contempt expenses loomed massive, given the likelihood of a considerable positive and even incarceration. Still, there have been indicators of a possible thaw because the Clintons appeared to be looking for an off-ramp to testify. In addition, passage of contempt expenses via the total House was removed from assured, requiring a majority vote — one thing Republicans more and more battle to obtain.

The Clintons have mentioned they’d nothing to do with Epstein for many years and are searching for a decision to the dispute. This week, they supplied to have the committee management and employees interview Bill Clinton in New York.

Comer rejected that supply Tuesday, insisting that any interview even have an official transcript.

What do lawmakers need to know from the Clintons?

The push in Washington for a reckoning over Epstein has proven particulars of the connections between the rich financier and each Bill Clinton and Trump, amongst many different high-powered males. Epstein killed himself in 2019 in a New York jail cell whereas awaiting trial.

Bill Clinton, President Donald Trump and many others linked to Epstein haven’t been accused of wrongdoing. Yet lawmakers are wrestling over who receives essentially the most scrutiny.

A spokesman for the Clintons, Angel Ureña, mentioned on social media that the Clintons try to assist the Epstein investigation however that “both Clintons have been out of office for over a decade. Neither had anything to do with him for more than 20 years.”

Behind the scenes, longtime Clinton lawyer David Kendall has tried to negotiate an settlement with Comer for months. Kendall raised the prospect of having the Clintons testify on Christmas and Christmas Eve, in accordance to the committee’s account of the negotiations.

The Clintons, who contend the subpoenas are invalid as a result of they don’t serve any legislative objective, have additionally supplied the committee written declarations about their interactions with Epstein.

How Democrats are approaching the difficulty

Democrats have largely been targeted on advancing the investigation into Epstein reasonably than mounting a protection of the Clintons, who led their get together for many years. They agreed that Bill Clinton ought to inform the committee if he has any pertinent details about Epstein’s abuses.

A rich financier, Epstein donated to Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential marketing campaign and Hillary Clinton’s joint fundraising committee forward of her 2000 Senate marketing campaign in New York.

“No president or former president is above the law,” the highest Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Robert Garcia, mentioned on the listening to.

On Wednesday, Democrats tried to advance a number of adjustments to the contempt of Congress expenses. Several argued that Hillary Clinton must be exempted as a result of she has mentioned she had little or no private interplay with Epstein. Democratic lawmakers additionally tried to downgrade the contempt of Congress decision to a civil reasonably than prison offense.

Democrats spent the listening to criticizing Comer for specializing in the Clintons when the Justice Department is operating a month late on a congressionally-mandated deadline to publicly launch its case information on Epstein. Comer has additionally allowed a number of former attorneys common to present the committee with written statements testifying to their restricted data of the case.

The committee had additionally subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime confidant, who’s serving a prolonged jail sentence for a conviction on intercourse trafficking expenses. But Comer declined to press for the interview after Maxwell’s lawyer indicated she would invoke Fifth Amendment rights in any deposition.

“It’s interesting that it’s this subpoena only that Republicans and the chairman have been obsessed about putting all their energy behind,” Garcia mentioned.

Comer mentioned the committee will interview Maxwell subsequent month. Attorney General Pam Bondi may even seem earlier than the House Judiciary Committee in February.

In the tip, 9 Democrats voted with all Republicans on the committee to advance contempt towards Bill Clinton, and three Democrats — Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — joined in the vote to advance the contempt decision for Hillary Clinton.

Democrats embraced the decision for full transparency on Epstein after Trump’s return to the White House, notably after Bondi came upon her promise to launch the whole thing of the unredacted Epstein information to the general public. The backlash scrambled conventional ideological traces, main Republicans to facet with Democrats demanding additional investigation.

The stress finally resulted in a bipartisan subpoena from the committee that ordered the Justice Department and Epstein’s property to launch information associated to Epstein. Republicans shortly moved to embrace the Clintons in the subpoena.

Comer has indicated that he’ll insist that the subpoena be fulfilled by nothing lower than a transcribed deposition of Bill Clinton.

“They’re going to have two weeks until this bill is on the floor,” he mentioned Wednesday

How contempt proceedings have been used

Contempt of Congress proceedings are uncommon, used traditionally as a final resort when lawmakers try to power testimony for high-profile investigations, such because the notorious inquiry in the course of the Nineteen Forties into alleged Communist sympathizers in Hollywood or the impeachment proceedings of President Richard Nixon.

Most not too long ago, Trump’s advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon have been convicted of contempt expenses for defying subpoenas from a House panel investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, riot by a mob of the Republican president’s supporters on the Capitol. Both Navarro and Bannon spent months in jail.

The Jan. 6 committee additionally subpoenaed Trump in its inquiry. Trump’s legal professionals resisted the subpoena, citing many years of authorized precedent they mentioned shielded ex-presidents from being ordered to seem earlier than Congress. The committee in the end withdrew its subpoena.

No former president has ever been efficiently compelled to seem earlier than Congress, though some have voluntarily appeared.

But some Republicans mentioned they need to face the identical penalties for refusing to testify as Bannon and Navarro.

Rep. Andy Biggs, an Arizona Republican, mentioned on social media that if the Clintons “aren’t perp walked, we will have failed the American people.”

This story was initially featured on Fortune.com

ZamPoint
  • Website

Related Posts

Resilience to relevance: The next Philippines’ takeoff?

February 3, 2026

‘No one is illegal on stolen land’: how the Grammys turned into a giant Trump roast and ICE protest

February 2, 2026

Exclusive: Anthropic announces partnerships with Allen Institute and Howard Hughes Medical Institute as it bets AI can make science more effici

February 2, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest RSS
  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Cookies Policy
  • DMCA
  • GDPR
  • Terms
© 2026 ZamPoint. Designed by Zam Publisher.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
►
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
None
Powered by