Hyderabad: A two-judge panel of the Telangana High Court dismissed a writ enchantment filed by an unsuccessful candidate in search of re-medical examination for choice to the publish of assistant motorized vehicle inspector (AMVI). The panel comprising Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G.M. Mohiuddin reiterated that courts can not intervene in issues of medical disqualification after an inordinate delay of eight years and within the absence of confirmed irregularities. The panel was dealing a writ enchantment filed by Ravi Kumar Manda. In an earlier continuing, the appellant had challenged his disqualification within the 2016 medical examination performed by the Osmania General Hospital, contending that it was performed in a faulty and negligent method and that he was wrongly declared unfit on the bottom that his chest growth was under the prescribed customary. He sought a route to the Telangana Public Service Commission to conduct a medical re-examination by referring him to a special hospital or medical board and to contemplate his candidature for appointment as AMVI, or alternatively to create a supernumerary publish. The identical was dismissed by the one decide. On the opposite hand, the TGPSC contended that structure of a second medical board on the occasion of unsuccessful candidates was impermissible until allegations of mala fide or manipulation have been established. It was additional contended that allowing re-medical examination practically eight years after the unique check could be neither possible nor legally sustainable and that the order of single decide was proper in dismissing, as there was no advantage within the writ petition. The panel accordingly refused to interdict the findings of the one decide.
HC refuses to halt store demolition
Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy of the Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition difficult the demolition of a store on the Nampally Market. The decide granted liberty to the petitioner to work out his cures earlier than the competent civil courtroom in accordance with the legislation, together with underneath the Street Vendors Act. The decide was coping with a writ plea filed by Mohd Fareeduddin Shah. It was contended by the petitioner that the officers of GHMC demolished his store with out issuing discover and with out following due means of legislation. It was contended that there was no dispute with the owner and that possession of the property was with the petitioner. It was identified {that a} illustration to the municipal authorities in search of restoration of possession of the store space remained in useless. On the opposite, the GHMC raised a preliminary objection concerning the maintainability of the writ petition, contending that the petitioner failed to ascertain locus standi as no doc was produced to show possession or lawful entitlement. Furthermore, the GHMC claimed
encroachment of the footpath. Justice Vijaysen Reddy held that the paperwork solely allowed a brief wood bunk of restricted space, which was later transferred to a 3rd celebration, and that there was no report allowing the petitioner to put in or retain any everlasting construction on the Nampally Market. The decide noticed that mere issuance of a commerce licence couldn’t be construed as recognition of lawful possession. The decide accordingly dismissed the writ plea observing that the petitioner failed to ascertain any enforceable proper.
HC reserves verdict is journos felony case
Justice Okay. Tirumala Devi of the Telangana High Court took on file a felony petition filed by reporter Manche Sagar, in search of quashing of felony proceedings towards him on prices of trespass and conspiracy. Counsel showing for the petitioner submitted that the reporter was overlaying an election marketing campaign and in the midst of his skilled duties recorded an alleged assault involving the de facto complainant, Ashish Kumar Ahuja, a businessman, and different accused. It was argued that there was no relationship between the petitioner and the accused, and that mere recording of an incident doesn’t quantity to conspiracy or trespass. The petitioner relied on screenshots and video recordings exhibiting the opposite accused allegedly breaking into the home of complainant and finishing up the assault. Opposing the plea, counsel for the de facto complainant contended that requirements of decency and accountability have to be noticed whereas recording such incidents. After listening to the submissions of each the events, the decide posted the matter for orders
OU ex-teacher seeks pension
Justice Surepalli Nanda of the Telangana High Court admitted a writ plea assailing the alleged inaction of the commissioner and director, directorate of college schooling, and different authorities, in failing to switch the capitalised worth of pension, gratuity, and accrued curiosity to Osmania University for the aim of counting a professor’s previous service in the direction of pensionary advantages. The decide was coping with a writ plea filed by Prof.
Dharavath Balaramulu. The petitioner contended that regardless of having rendered qualifying service throughout the interval from February 1984 to October 1997, which is liable to be reckoned along with his subsequent service underneath Osmania University, the respondent authorities did not launch the requisite quantities, thereby depriving him of his
reputable pensionary entitlements. It was delivered to the discover of the decide that the director of college schooling addressed a communication to Osmania University, pursuant to which a memo and a letter have been issued by the registrar of Osmania University to the commissioner and director, directorate of college schooling, calling upon the stated authority to take applicable motion within the matter. Despite such inter-departmental
