By Libor Jany
Los Angeles Times
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has banned Los Angeles Police Department officers from using some so-called less-lethal launchers at protests, after discovering that the division violated earlier court docket restrictions by using such projectile weapons to disperse crowds at final summer time’s mass demonstrations towards immigration enforcement.
In her ruling Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall sided with a contempt movement filed by attorneys for Black Lives Matter-Los Angeles.
| DOWNLOAD: 26 on 2026: A police management playbook
That similar day LAPD officers despatched a department-wide memo asserting a direct moratorium on the usage of the 40-millimeter weapons in mild of Marshall’s ruling. The memo suggested these searching for additional readability to contact the division’s danger administration and authorized affairs division.
“Accordingly, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY the 40mm SHALL NOT be used during any CROWD CONTROL situation,” stated the memo, a replica of which was reviewed by the Los Angeles Times.
A preliminary injunction handed down by Marshall in 2021 positioned certain restrictions on the weapons’ use, together with requiring specialised coaching for handlers; the issuance of a warning earlier than firing such weapons; and limiting their use solely to conditions during which “the officer reasonably believes that a suspect is violently resisting arrest or poses an immediate threat of violence or physical harm.”
The newest order halts the usage of a weapon, recognizable by its neon inexperienced deal with, that has been utilized by police throughout current protests to clear crowds after demonstrations have been declared illegal. The weapon launches projectiles the dimensions of a mini soda can at speeds of greater than 200 mph.
But attorneys for Black Lives Matters-L.A. argued that LAPD routinely flouted the injunction — citing quite a few obvious violations of their contempt movement. Officers already have been barred from firing their weapons from 5 toes away or nearer, or from concentrating on an individual’s head, groin or backbone, however attorneys argued that police repeatedly did so.
One lawyer stated the division additionally appeared to be violating its personal pointers governing the 40-millimeter’s use by capturing journalists and others in delicate areas similar to the top.
“And they’re certainly not supposed to shoot them in the back of the head as they’re trying to leave,” stated Carol Sobel, a distinguished legal professional whose litigation pressured the LAPD to cut back aggressive crowd-control practices prior to now. “The bottom line is the LAPD is going to bankrupt the city with its refusal to follow the law.”
The movement additionally cited a ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that discovered such weapons shouldn’t be used to disperse crowds. It was the newest authorized problem to the usage of the 40-millimeter, which the LAPD additionally makes use of in day-to-day operations. The order doesn’t apply to such makes use of.
In the previous the division issued comparable, if short-term moratoriums on the usage of different projectile weapons that fireplace so-called skip and beanbag rounds.
This week the City Council voted in favor of latest limits on the deployment of LAPD officers at protests, encouraging a “graded response” during which officers in riot gear can be deployed provided that wanted.
Los Angeles police confronted a number of allegations of extreme pressure throughout protests towards the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown final summer time. The division’s response already spawned lawsuits, together with from the Los Angeles Press Club, which pointed to video proof and scores of testimonials suggesting that regulation enforcement violated its personal pointers and state regulation.
Earlier this 12 months a unique federal judge issued an order barring the LAPD from using less-lethal munitions towards journalists and nonviolent protesters — a ruling that’s beneath attraction.
Lawyers for the City of Los Angeles and Department of Homeland Security beforehand argued that the judge’s ban was impractical and overly broad. Although police nonetheless can use less-lethal weapons to include unruly demonstrators, town claimed the foundations put officers at danger of hesitating in chaotic conditions.
How do you assume this ruling will have an effect on the LAPD’s potential to handle large-scale demonstrations?
In a publish on X following reviews of the investigation into Gov. Tim Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey, AG Pam Bondi stated: “A reminder to all those in Minnesota: No one is above the law”
January 20, 2026 03:57 PM
Adrian Gonzalez was discovered not responsible of kid endangerment for his actions through the 2022 mass capturing that killed 19 youngsters and two lecturers
January 21, 2026 09:18 PM
The deputy had resigned from the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office after an investigation discovered his on-duty overdose was brought on by intentional use of seized fentanyl
January 20, 2026 09:57 AM
Holyoke Councilor Israel Rivera advised officers, “You know who the (expletive) I am? I’m not a regular (racial slur),” and later, “I’m the one that makes your (expletive) budget (racial slur).”
January 21, 2026 10:55 AM
©2026 Los Angeles Times. Visit latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hexagon’s next-generation platform offers quicker, smarter emergency response
January 15, 2026 05:53 PM
